Differences between revisions 7 and 12 (spanning 5 versions)
Revision 7 as of 2016-11-28 15:04:36
Size: 2015
Editor: shoobe01
Comment:
Revision 12 as of 2016-12-08 13:08:28
Size: 3463
Editor: shoobe01
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 8: Line 8:
 * [[https://medium.com/@jmspool/fast-path-to-a-great-ux-increased-exposure-hours-afde796f2e43#.9or5wk1zz|
Fast Path to a Great UX — Increased Exposure Hours]] Go see users, every 6 weeks, everyone. Not just designers...
 * [[https://medium.com/@jmspool/fast-path-to-a-great-ux-increased-exposure-hours-afde796f2e43#.9or5wk1zz|Fast Path to a Great UX — Increased Exposure Hours]] Go see users, every 6 weeks, everyone. Not just designers...
 * [[http://mediatel.co.uk/newsline/2013/11/27/dont-say-what-you-think-say-what-you-feel/|Don’t say what you think, but do what you feel]] I guess I am removed enough from the ad world I missed David Ogilvy saying long ago "The problem with market research is that people don't think how they feel, they don't say what they think and they don't do what they say." This article... Meh! But the quote is awesome!
 * [[http://hinessight.blogs.com/church_of_the_churchless/2014/06/five-simple-rules-of-science-from-neil-degrasse-tyson.html|text]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dasQ7HnDoI|video]] - We are scientists. Believe it!
 * Winced my way through this article against progressive enhancement [[https://www.viget.com/articles/the-case-against-progressive-enhancements-flimsy-moral-foundation|The Case Against Progressive Enhancement's Flimsy Moral Foundation]] Winced harder when I saw myself quoted [[https://twitter.com/brad_frost/status/805778784226070528?s=03|Twitter thread]] with many fun responses -- Also this rebuttal [[https://www.aaron-gustafson.com/notebook/insert-clickbait-headline-about-progressive-enhancement-here/]]
 * [[http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/12/07/information-overload/|]] I have long thought very little of the many tech self help hurts who insist we're all overwhelmed with information and technology. Why do we keep buying such devices then? Well, it's broadly untrue. 80% prefer their information.

Notes: Look up design ethos (simple vs decorative) and try to find why the women's pavilion used the Qing (simple) and men's used the Ming. Add to flat design maybe. Not all rooted in Swiss modernism maybe!

January 2017 (last edited 2017-01-12 15:13:53 by shoobe01)